Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-10-2024, 10:09 AM
joshman's Avatar
joshman (Josh)
Registered User

joshman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 684
~158hrs on the Helix Nebula

This image has been such an annoyance capture and process, between some poor data management last year, clouds this year, and some difficult (for me) post processing hurdles, I've managed to put 158 hrs of data into this image.

The Helix Nebula is one of those surprisingly complex Deep Sky Objects. On the surface, it is incredibly easy to shoot - it's large, bright, and fairly easy to get a great image with only a few hours of integration; However a bit more integration time reveals the existence of a quite extensive and very faint outer Ha shell. The near 60hrs of Ha data in my image only just starts to hint at what I believe to be the full extent of this outer shell.

As Always, C&C is very welcome, especially on this image, as I'm not 100% on board with the current processing.

Be sure to check it out on Astrobin!

Thanks for looking, and Clear Skies!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (1jr6zs2mGa4z_1824x0_4nd3mLr4.jpg)
62.3 KB94 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2024, 10:17 AM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,381
Awesome image, I reckon you can get way more out of this with some selective processing as it appears to me the black areas are clipped and you can get way more nebulosity in the fainter areas. Especially with so much acquisition time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-10-2024, 10:27 AM
joshman's Avatar
joshman (Josh)
Registered User

joshman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
Awesome image, I reckon you can get way more out of this with some selective processing as it appears to me the black areas are clipped and you can get way more nebulosity in the fainter areas. Especially with so much acquisition time.

Thanks Nik! You're completely correct! There is a lot of Ha detail being left on the table in that process. I've gone back to the drawing board and reprocessed it to showcase it more prominently. There is a huge amount of Dynamic range in this target, and the faintest details are really close to the background/noise floor.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (9iwuWb_vmF8C_1824x0_4nd3mLr4.jpg)
85.1 KB81 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-10-2024, 10:25 PM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,381
Wow that second image shows so much more!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-10-2024, 05:55 PM
gaseous's Avatar
gaseous (Patrick)
Registered User

gaseous is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 809
That second photo is bonkers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-10-2024, 07:26 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,019
In all honesty I think 158hrs didn't achieve much more than say 22 hrs posted by another forum member. Statistically, each successive doubling of the number of exposures will increase the signal-to-noise ratio by a factor of 1.4 i.e. the square root of 2. there is a law of diminishing returns since each successive exposure has less and less impact on the final stacked image. The image is nice but no more so than others that have posted with lesser total integration. Sorry but that is my opinion for what its worth
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-10-2024, 07:37 AM
joshman's Avatar
joshman (Josh)
Registered User

joshman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
Wow that second image shows so much more!!
Thanks Nik! I definitely think that there is more to be seen hidden in the background with some significant integration time investment.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gaseous View Post
That second photo is bonkers.
Thank Patrick!



Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
In all honesty I think 158hrs didn't achieve much more than say 22 hrs posted by another forum member. Statistically, each successive doubling of the number of exposures will increase the signal-to-noise ratio by a factor of 1.4 i.e. the square root of 2. there is a law of diminishing returns since each successive exposure has less and less impact on the final stacked image. The image is nice but no more so than others that have posted with lesser total integration. Sorry but that is my opinion for what its worth
True... but I'm not chasing more detail in the core, that can be had after just a few hours, I'm really chasing the background detail; the really faint extra shell(s) around the outside, and the 58hrs of Ha in my image is (I suspect) only scratching the surface of what's needed to really show their full extent.


See the attachment for an inverted copy of the Ha Channel to see what I mean.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Screenshot 2024-10-11 202048_markedrs.jpg)
195.4 KB14 views
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-10-2024, 09:52 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,499
Love the inverted Halpha, so cool, you have gone pretty deep

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-10-2024, 10:07 AM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,334
This is wonderful mate. What an epic project and congrats on a great image. I love that Ha data. Wow what amazing detail in those outer shells!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-10-2024, 07:12 PM
joshman's Avatar
joshman (Josh)
Registered User

joshman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Love the inverted Halpha, so cool, you have gone pretty deep

Mike

Thanks Mike! It's the deepest Helix I've ever seen.
(that was the goal)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave882 View Post
This is wonderful mate. What an epic project and congrats on a great image. I love that Ha data. Wow what amazing detail in those outer shells!!
Thanks Dave! I'm really happy with the amount of detail I've been able to bring out in those outer shells. I'm looking forward to adding more in the future.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement