Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-07-2024, 07:03 AM
Rusty2
Registered User

Rusty2 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Batemans Bay
Posts: 91
Omega Centaurii

Hello again : )

Last Friday and Saturday night were clear here on the South Coast so I took the opportunity
to do some imaging/experimenting .

I tried to image the Rim Nebula , Herschel's Ray and Omega Centaurii and lost 60% of them to eccenctricity .

I'm still having problems taming my RA axis but thanks to PaulSthcoast , I think I found the reason it hasn't been behaving . The plate on my pier was pretty close to level but the level bubble on the AZ-EQ6 GT was way off .

Although I lost 40 out of 50 2 minute subs , Omega Centaurii came out nice enough for a beginner . It looks far better on a colour corrected 4K monitor .

SW Esprit 150 ED
ZWO ASI6200 OSC
10 out of 50 2 minute subs
20 flats 50 darks 20 bias .
Pixinsight Lightroom
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Cen clustercopy.jpg)
217.7 KB139 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-07-2024, 08:52 AM
Anth10's Avatar
Anth10 (Anthony M)
When its late stay awake

Anth10 is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Briar Hill
Posts: 819
Rusty, you’ve got yourself a nice result here albeit the lost subs etc.
This is such a mesmerising glob, plenty of stars.

You certainly have captured a nice central mass, pin point stars mate and good colour (shorter exposure could improve even more with that)
Well done
Anthony
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-07-2024, 04:58 PM
Zubenel's Avatar
Zubenel (Wes)
Awe and Wonder

Zubenel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SE QLD
Posts: 589
I mirror Anthony's remarks. A nice rendition. Give 30 sec subs a crack and compare. Cheers

Last edited by Zubenel; 20-07-2024 at 04:58 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-07-2024, 12:40 PM
Rusty2
Registered User

Rusty2 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Batemans Bay
Posts: 91
Anthony , Wes , I appreciate your advice , thank you , I'll have a go at shorter subs : )
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2024, 08:22 PM
Doogs38's Avatar
Doogs38 (Alex)
Wingnut

Doogs38 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 428
Hi Rusty. Nice pic ... makes me think I should give more love to GCs. Regarding your AZ-EQ6, I use one too and have never trusted the built-in bubble level. I bought a 2 x small levels from good ol Bunnings: a much larger version of the mount's bubble level, and, a small 'normal level bar ... it's about 20cm long. I learnt two things from using them - the small plate that steadies the tripod's legs is a good proxy for the judging if the mount is level, and, IMHO the mount doesn't need to be perfectly level to work well (... as discussed over at the Cloudynight forums) but getting it close is certainly desirable. Every time I set up my mount I do a very quick check (using the small level) to make sure it's roughly level and then crack on! Alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2024, 03:38 PM
Rusty2
Registered User

Rusty2 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Batemans Bay
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doogs38 View Post
IMHO the mount doesn't need to be perfectly level to work well Alex
It doesn't seem to have made much of a difference Alex , but I also dropped the guide speed to .25 and saw an instant change in the RA axis . It has settled right down and my guiding is now under the threshold for my scope . 15 and 20 minute exposures aren't a problem .

Thanks for your thoughts !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement